About

Stephen Williams is a writer and investigative journalist.

His reputation was solidified by the international success of two books, “Invisible Darkness: The Horrifying Case of Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka” and “Karla: A Pact with the Devil” which were critically acclaimed as “apocalyptic stories set in landscapes of suburban deviance.”

His nonfiction work has been compared to that of Norman Mailer and Truman Capote.

Professor George Elliott Clark wrote “The true crime is, in the hands of artists like Truman Capote and Stephen Williams, a kind of poetry, a kind of austere grand guignol, exuding gaudy horror.”

“On an aesthetic level, “Karla: A Pact with the Devil” is almost unique in our literature.” poet and publisher Barry Callaghan said. “It is an extraordinary act of the imagination brought to bear on the facts.”

Mr. Williams was twice arrested to do with these books, once in 1998 and again in 2003, criminally charged with over one hundred counts of disobeying court orders and publication bans, twice put on trial over the eight-year period between 1998 and 2005, and twice exonerated.

The Attorney General also sued Mr. Williams in 2003 as an enemy of the State, alleging he was in possession of “sensitive” court documents. The lawsuit sought unspecified damages and the seizure of Mr. Williams’ research and archives. Although the courts and police seized his computer and files, the lawsuit did not succeed.

In 2004, Mr. Williams was given the Hellman-Hammett Award by the Human Rights Watch. The Award is usually presented annually to journalists who have been prosecuted by totalitarian regimes such as China and Iran.

Stephen Williams lives on a rockscrabble farm in southwestern Ontario with the writer Marsha Boulton and their young Bull Terrier, Thelonius Monk.

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “About

    • I do not. I did not have anything to do with Sellers or his misguided project. The producer who, at that time, owned the film etertainment rights to “Invisible Darkness” compelled him to leave a good deal of footage on the cutting room floor as it infringed on our proprietary rights as well as pay a token “permission” fee to us if he wanted to actually go ahead and make the thing anyway, even though it was destined to be, how shall I put it, substandard. He did not strike me as an honest or righteous broker. I only met him once, briefly, and never saw or heard of him again. Had he been convicted of fraud and tossed in jail it would not surprise me. That’s all.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s